Showing posts with label Thom Tillis. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Thom Tillis. Show all posts

09 August 2012

From Arc NC: Unintended Budget Cuts Must Be Fixed!


Unintended Budget Cuts Must Be Fixed!

[ view original posting ]

It’s time for the Governor and members of the General Assembly to fix the “unintended” reductions of the Social Services Block Grant (SSBG) for people with disabilities. Both legislators and the Governor’s administration seem to agree that an additional cut of $4.3 million to the community system was unintended. Unintended or not, this cut, on top of the $20 million intended reduction by the General Assembly, is causing serious harm to people with disabilities and their families.

It is hard do imagine that while the state is attempting to negotiate a settlement with the U.S. Department of Justice on ADA issues, we would allow further reductions to the fragile infrastructure of the community system. Services that allow people to live at home or in community residential settings are affected by this cut the most. Letting this “accidental” cut stand will hurt people.

The Arc, in a letter to the Governor, has asked that she take the lead on eliminating this cut. We are sending a similar letter to the House and Senate leadership asking them to join with the Governor to fix this unfortunate mistake. Hopefully, all parties will work together to do so.

Members can help by letting the Governor and General Assembly know that this cut must be restored. Let them know that our fragile community system cannot stand more reductions and that people with disabilities deserve better!

Contact:

24 May 2012

Parent Legislative Correspondence

Colleen is the parent a 12-year-old son and CAP recipient with multiple diagnosis and special needs including an auto immune disease and Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) attributing to many medical, developmental and behavioral issues. She also has another child with needs who is not being served. Posted with parent permission.


Colleen is in NC House District 36, Senate District 17 and will fall under Alliance Behavioral Health Care LME (formerly the Durham Center) upon implementation.

Legislative Correspondence 

from another Parent Perspective


From: COLLEEN  Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:12 AM

To:  Senator Richard Stevens <Richard.Stevens@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Nelson Dollar <Nelson.Dollar@ncleg.net>
House Speaker Thom Tillis <Thom.Tillis@ncleg.net>, 
Office of NC Governor <governor.office@nc.gov>, 
Representative Justin P. Burr <Justin.Burr@ncleg.net>,
US HHS Commissioner Sharon Lewis <sharon.lewis@acf.hhs.gov>, 
Joint Caucus Leader Marilyn Avila <Marilyn.Avila@ncleg.net>, 
Representative William A. Current, Sr. <Bill.Current@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr. <Fletcher.Hartsell@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Tommy Tucker <Tommy.Tucker@ncleg.net>


Dear Representatives:


As a constituent, I am asking you to reconsider the move forward with the current HB 916 until there is a restoration of Independent Case Management, establishment of a third party unbiased binding conflict resolution entity and an unbiased SIS evaluator not employed directly by the MCO. There are more issues that are relevant to this Waiver that are concerns to families like mine as well. Habilitative services is needed to ensure individuals the ability to provide some independent level of care if not complete independence, later on. Enhanced Personal Care is also imperative to families that have children with more involved personal care needs involving GI problems, medication administration, and intense behavior supports to name a few. Eliminating these services will create a bias against these more involved children as staff will not work and pick up cases that require much more effort and unpleasant things to deal with when there is no incentive to do so. The necessity of CAP services to enable families to function and allow siblings to have some normalcy, is imperative to allow for a system that is not burdened down the road with institutionalized adults and broken families. Lastly, appropriate CAP level services in place provides the support families need to just be a family. I will close with a personal example of how these services are needed to just allow families to deal with every day things that happen in all our lives, but can become a crisis without support from CAP:

CAP services are imperative for families like mine. We have more than one child with special needs, but only one with CAP. When my husband's father just recently passed away, we would have been in a tailspin without our CAP workers. One of us would have had to miss all the planning, viewing, hanging out grieving with family and seeing family members that live out of State who we hadn't seen in many years, if it weren't for the supports we had. My son could not handle all the noise, chaos and environment of funeral planning and the viewing. His CAP workers and I brainstormed how to help him handle the loss of his grandfather and explain this to him. We came up with a wonderful concrete picture that he grasped. The CAP workers kept him with them at home while we traveled to another town in NC. They continued his programs/routine as we went about the various duties and family commitments involved in this type of loss. We decided it was best for him to not attend the viewing as it might confuse him. We explained to him that he would go to a "Funeral" and it was a place we would say goodbye to Grandpa and see his casket, which was a "car" that you ride to heaven in and we wouldn't see him again till we moved there too. He then came to the funeral with his CAP worker and she was able to keep him quiet and help him participate in this aspect of it all. She did various sensory strategies to keep him sitting still and attending, bringing along little hand toys, sensory brushes etc. to help him remain there. He did! To our amazement and thankfulness to his 10 year CAP worker who knows him so well, she had just the right strategies to enable him to do this. We all stood together as the casket was placed into the hurst and we said together "there goes Grandpa in his casket, he's riding to heaven". He understood. He hasn't asked for Grandpa again which is unusual since he saw him every Sunday and looked forward to his "tickles" and cuddling in the rocking chair. So we know he got it and is at peace with it. We are so thankful for our CAP workers and how they rallied behind our family and provided the supports that were necessary to enable us to spend long days with family, grieve and have this time together with extended family.

That is just one example of what CAP does for families like mine and that's not addressing all they have done habilitatively for my son, which I could also write personal examples of such as his ability to now toilet, feed and bath independently - we are so thankful for CAP.

Thank you for your continued commitment to do what is right and to forge a plan that makes sense for our voiceless children caught up in fiscal difficulties that are not their faults and should not balanced on their already burdened backs.

Respectfully,

Colleen


21 May 2012

Parent Legislative Correspondence

Mary K. Short is a strong advocate and the parent caregiver of an adult DD recipient with profound needs.


Mary and her daughter live in NC House District 88 and Senate District 42. Her daughter is being served by Smoky Mountain LME.

Legislative Correspondence 

from another Parent Perspective

Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:49 PM
From: MaryKShort@aol.com
To: Senator Louis Pate <louis.pate@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Justin P. Burr <justin.burr@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Nelson Dollar <nelson.dollar@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Martha Alexander <martha.alexander@ncleg.net>, 
Representative William D. Brisson <william.brisson@ncleg.net>, 
Representative William A. Current, Sr. <bill.current@ncleg.net>,  
Representative Mark W. Hollo <mark.hollo@ncleg.net>,  
Representative Pat B. Hurley <pat.hurley@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Bert Jones <bert.jones@ncleg.net>,  
Representative Marian N. McLawhorn <marian.mclawhorn@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Tom Murry <tom.murry@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Fred F. Steen, II <fred.steen@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Austin M. Allran <austin.allran@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Doug Berger <doug.berger@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Stan Bingham <stan.bingham@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Harris Blake <harris.blake@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Jim Davis <jim.davis@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Fletcher L. Hartsell, Jr. <fletcher.hartsell@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Eric Mansfield <eric.mansfield@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Martin L. Nesbitt, Jr. <martin.nesbitt@ncleg.net>, 
Senator William R. Purcell <william.purcell@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Tommy Tucker <tommy.tucker@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Andrew C. Brock <andrew.brock@ncleg.net>, 
Senator Ralph Hise <ralph.hise@ncleg.net>, 
Joint Caucus Leader Marilyn Avila <marilyn.avila@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Rayne Brown <rayne.brown@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Tricia Ann Cotham <tricia.cotham@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Beverly M. Earle <beverly.earle@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Shirley B. Randleman <shirley.randleman@ncleg.net>, 
Representative Mitchell S. Setzer <mitchell.setzer@ncleg.net>, 
House Speaker Thom Tillis <Thom.Tilllis@ncleg.net>


Dear Speaker Tillis and Members of NCGA:

I have sent emails to DMA requesting the best practice documentation that was used to support the 40 hour Policy limit on parent/family that is in the NC Innovations Waiver, the CAP-IDD Waiver, and Clinical Policy 8M. At that same time, I requested the best practice documentation that was used to support the Home Supports (HS) service definition from the 2008 CAP-MR/DD Comprehensive Waiver. I have not received a response.

Here is what the State Strategic Plan for MHDDSAS 2010-2013, dated July 1, 2010, page 12 of 46 says:
"Evidence based practices are those that have been shown to be effective in multiple, scientifically conducted research studies, while best practices are accepted clinical practices that demonstrate success for the individuals served."
I have asked for that documentation because they are in direct conflict with one another.

In 2008, DMA said parents may only work a daily service, no limit on the number of days.
(Home Supports has a "direct contact hours" component attached. Using DMA guidelines for HS Level 2, 6.5 hours a day maximum, would require a parent to work 45.5 hours a week maximum for the past 3+ years AND the highest level, HS Level 5, 12.5 hours a day minimum, would require the parent to work 87.5 hours a week minimum.)
Then in 2011-12, DMA said we cannot work over 40 hours a week. This is only parents or family members who live with an individual, not any unrelated staff who comes into the home or any AFL or other Group Home worker. I did not ask for the best practice documentation that DMA has used to consistently support unrelated workers working more than 40 hours a week.

As I have been waiting for a response from DMA, I did find this information posted below to PBH's web site: "To date, there are no national practice guidelines for the I/DD population." (Link provided below.)

If that statement was true when published on PBH's web site on 09292011, then what are families to believe about any DMA best practices placed into any waiver, rule, policy, or procedure? If DMA suspects some sort of rampant abuse by parents (or other living with family member) performing services, then why haven't their internal monitoring controls exposed those abuses?

I am asking that you all intervene on behalf of the 1,091 (+/-) parents (or other living with family members) who have been providing Home Supports for the past 3+ years and STOP the implementation of the 40 hour policy once and for all. I am asking you to believe me when I tell you that NO family who has participated as a formal stakeholder has said to me at any time that they SUPPORT the 40 hour limit on parents/family members. In fact, I am consistently told by formal stakeholder family members or individuals, that they SUPPORT CHOICE by the individual and/or guardian.

Finally, I want you to consider the following two NC Innovations service plans:
(Home Supports changes to: PC = Personal Care / I-HSB = In-Home Skill Building)

After accounting for unpaid supports, if he/she needs less than 40 hours of PC/I-HSB, then he/she gets to choose to use his/her parent to perform all PC/I-HSB services.

After accounting for unpaid supports, if he/she needs more than 40 hours of PC/I-HSR, then he/she CANNOT choose to use his/her parent to perform all PC/I-HSB services or any number of hours over 40 hours.
Why is it that the individual with the least ability to adjust to change is forced to change?

Mary K. Short
828-632-5888 or 704-451-4144 (cell)

http://www.pbhcare.org/guidelinearticles.asp **(Reviewed/Updated 03/26/2012)**

http://www.pbhcare.org/pubdocs/upload/documents/intro%20to%20IDD.pdf (09292011)

Introduction to I/DD (Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities)
Practice Guidelines

To date, there are no national practice guidelines for the I/DD population. In response to this situation, PBH initiated the development of an I/DD workgroup to draft guidelines. The I/DD work group includes stakeholders such as clinicians, providers, and family members who worked on a variety of projects related to the development of Practice Guidelines for I/DD Population. While the Practice Guidelines developed by the I/DD Workgroup are not exhaustive, the intention is that the guidelines will give providers and families useful information that can facilitate the process of learning more about I/DD.
http://www.pbhcare.org/pubdocs/upload/documents/Best%20Practice%20Guidelines%2011%2006%2006.pdf (10202011)

Practice Guidelines In
Working with Individuals Who
Have Developmental Disabilities
Tassé, M.J., Havercamp, S.M., & Thompson, C. (2006). Practice Guidelines in Working with Individuals who have Developmental Disabilities. Concord, NC: PBH.

From page 107:
PBH is concerned about the impermanence of funding sources and services for individuals with developmental disabilities. We are committed to empowering consumers and their families by giving you the information, skills, and resources you need to identify and obtain the best available supports. In this way, we help you become less reliant on the service delivery system to achieve your goals.