23 October 2012

CAP-IDD ... this is NOT NC Innovations

From Mary K. Short:


The links to the announcements and guidance are below.  The changes from CAP-MR/DD to CAP-IDD are approved by CMS on 10/1/2012 BUT are not implemented until 1/1/2013.  If you are in an LME that is supposed to convert to an MCO before or on 1/1/2013 THIS DOES NOT APPLY TO YOU (or if you are already on the NC Innovations waiver) because you should be working on the transition to the NC Innovations waiver for your LME/MCO "go live" date prior to or on 1/1/2013.  The Special Medicaid Bulletin is specific about timelines and who is and who is not impacted.
Additionally, this is part of what Doug Sea sent out to providers/case managers.  I know he works with DRNC (Disability Rights North Carolina www.disabilityrightsnc.org) and you should probably contact them if you have questions.  If you are in Legal Services of the Southern Piedmont area (Mecklenburg & surrounding), then contact LSSP at www.lssp.org.
The instructions do not include the right to request continuation of current services as a reasonable accommodation under the ADA. Nor do the instructions provide for the right to a notice with appeal rights if such a request is made and denied. It will be up to advocates and providers to let families know they have the right to submit such a plan and to appeal to OAH if denied if they are at serious risk of institutionalization without continuation of their current services. Please make families aware of this.  
Essentially the same issue will occur for families transitioning to the Innovations waiver on January 1 .  Those 36 counties are also listed in this bulletin.
Here are some other possible specific issues to look for as CAP-DD families transition to the new CAP-IDD waiver (for a short time) and to the Innovations waiver:
A.      if LME doesn’t have adequate provider network, can family continue to be paid to provide home support services?
B.      If rate paid to provider is changing (eg no more enhanced personal care services or enhanced respite) and new rate is inadequate to attract qualified provider for this recipient, can recipient appeal rate reduction/loss of enhanced service?
C.      Does the requirement that  Intensive In home support have a fading plan and the 6 month limit for intensive night services violate the ADA or EPSDT?
D.      Does the restriction on services during school hours violate EPSDT if the child requests personal care (not hab serv) in excess of that limit?
E.       Does child recipient have right to case management in addition to care coordination under epsdt if medically necessary in that case because the LME staff are not adequately trained or don’t do medically necessary work the current case manager has been doing?
F.       Does the LME violate due process by “crosswalking” to new services without explaining right to request continued current service and to appeal if denied?
Mary K. Short
828-632-5888 or 704-451-4144 (cell)
Special Medicaid Bulletin:
http://www.ncdhhs.gov/dma/  (SCROLL down, it's the first bullet point on the left.)
OR direct link to the Bulletin:
CLINICAL POLICY 8M:
(Clinical Policy 8M ... this is the IDD 8M.  I do not have an answer for how it got approved and posted without an additional comment period!)